Registro español de hemodinámica y cardiología intervencionista. XXXII informe oficial de la Asociación de Cardiología Intervencionista de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1990-2022) / Spanish cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention registry. 32nd official report of the Interventional Cardiology Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (1990-2022)

Introducción y objetivos: Se presenta el informe de actividad del año 2022 de la Asociación de Cardiología Intervencionista de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (ACI-SEC). Métodos: Se invitó a todos los laboratorios de hemodinámica a participar en el registro. La recogida de datos se realizó a través de un cuestionario telemático. Una empresa externa realizó el análisis de datos, revisados por la junta directiva de la ACI-SEC. Resultados: Participaron 111 centros. El número de estudios diagnósticos aumentó un 4,8% con respecto a 2021, y el número de intervenciones coronarias percutáneas (ICP) se mantuvo estable. Las ICP sobre tronco coronario izquierdo aumentaron un 22%. El abordaje radial sigue siendo preferencial para las ICP (94,9%) y se observa un incremento de uso del balón farmacoactivo. El uso de técnicas de imagen intracoronaria se ha incrementado y se utilizan en el 14,7% de las ICP. También aumenta el uso de guía de presión (el 6,3% con respecto a 2021) y técnicas de modificación de placa. Sigue creciendo la ICP primaria, el tratamiento más frecuente (97%) en el infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST. La mayoría de los procedimientos no coronarios mantienen su tendencia creciente; destacan los implantes percutáneos de válvula aórtica, el cierre de orejuela, la técnica borde-a-borde mitral/tricuspídea, la denervación renal y el tratamiento de la enfermedad de la arteria pulmonar. Conclusiones: El Registro español de hemodinámica y cardiología intervencionista de 2022 demuestra un incremento en la complejidad de la enfermedad coronaria y un crecimiento notable de los procedimientos en cardiopatía estructural valvular y no valvular.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: This article presents the annual activity report of the Interventional Cardiology Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (ACI-SEC) for the year 2022. Methods: All Spanish centers with catheterization laboratories were invited to participate. Data were collected online and were analyzed by an external company in collaboration with the members of the board of the ACI-SEC. Results: A total of 111 centers participated. The number of diagnostic studies increased by 4.8% compared with 2021, while that of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) remained stable. PCIs on the left main coronary artery increased by 22%. The radial approach continued to be preferred for PCI (94.9%). There was an upsurge in the use of drug-eluting balloons, as well as in intracoronary imaging techniques, which were used in 14.7% of PCIs. The use of pressure wires also increased (6.3% vs 2021) as did plaque modification techniques. Primary PCI continued to grow and was the most frequent treatment (97%) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Most noncoronary procedures maintained their upward trend, particularly percutaneous aortic valve implantation, atrial appendage closure, mitral/tricuspid edge-to-edge therapy, renal denervation, and percutaneous treatment of pulmonary arterial disease. Conclusions: The Spanish cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention registry for 2022 reveals a rise in the complexity of coronary disease, along with a notable growth in procedures for valvular and nonvalvular structural heart disease.(AU)

Reevaluación del diagnóstico y el tratamiento de las infecciones de dispositivos de electroestimulación cardiaca mediante [18F]FDG-PET/TC / Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

Introducción y objetivos: El papel de la tomografía por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada con 18F-fluorodesoxiglucosa ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) en las infecciones de los dispositivos de electroestimulación cardiaca (DEC) requiere una evaluación más precisa. El objetivo del trabajo es determinar su rendimiento en cada región topográfica del DEC, su capacidad en la diferenciación de infecciones locales aisladas y sistémicas, la utilidad de la captación de bazo y médula ósea (MO) para diferenciar entre infecciones locales y sistémicas y su potencial utilidad en el seguimiento de las infecciones de los DEC. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de 54 casos de infección de DEC y 54 controles durante 2014-2021. Se estudió el rendimiento diagnóstico en cada región topográfica del DEC. Se evaluó la combinación de la [18F]FDG-PET/CT con el ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) para diagnosticar infecciones sistémicas, el papel de la actividad en MO y bazo y su posible utilidad para guiar la duración de la antibioterapia crónica cuando no se retira el DEC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 13 (24%) infecciones locales aisladas y 41 (76%) infecciones sistémicas. En general, la [18F]FDG-PET/CT mostró un 100% de especificidad y el 85% de sensibilidad, que fue del 79% en el bolsillo, el 57% en el cable subcutáneo, el 22% en el cable endovascular y del 10% en el cable intracardiaco. En las infecciones sistémicas, la [18F]FDG-PET/CT en combinación con ETE aumentó el diagnóstico definitivo del 34 al 56% (p=0,04). Los casos con bacteriemia mostraron hipermetabolismo del bazo (p=0,05) y la MO (p=0,04). Se obtuvo una [18F]FDG-PET/CT de seguimiento de 13 pacientes sin extracción del DEC. No hubo recaídas al suspender la antibioterapia crónica en 6 casos con [18F]FDG-PET/CT negativa. Conclusiones: La sensibilidad de la [18F]FDG-PET/CT para evaluar infecciones locales es mayor que en infecciones sistémicas y aumenta en las sistémicas en combinación con ETE...(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up. Methods: Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed. Results: We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Conclusions: The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections...(AU)

Manejo y tratamiento actual de la insuficiencia cardiaca en unidades acreditadas de cardiología y medicina interna en España / Current heart failure disease management and treatment in accredited units from cardiology and internal medicine in Spain

Antecedentes y objetivos La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es una patología compleja con una alta prevalencia, incidencia y mortalidad que conlleva un importante coste sanitario. En España existen unidades de IC (UIC) multidisciplinares, lideradas por cardiología y medicina interna. Nuestro objetivo era conocer su organización actual y adherencia a las últimas recomendaciones científicas. Materiales y métodos Un comité científico formado por cardiólogos e internistas elaboró una encuesta a finales de 2021, que fue enviada a 110 UIC. Setenta y tres de cardiología, acreditadas por SEC-Excelente, y 37 de medicina interna, integradas en el programa UMIPIC. Resultados Se recibieron 83 encuestas cumplimentadas (75,5%); 49 de cardiología y 34 de medicina interna. Los resultados mostraron que las UIC están integradas mayoritariamente por un cardiólogo, internista y enfermería especializada (34,9%). El perfil de paciente atendido en las UIC cardiológicas es muy diferente al paciente de las UMIPIC, siendo estos últimos mayores, con fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda conservada y más carga de comorbilidad. La mayoría de UIC actualmente realizan seguimiento mixto, presencial y telemático (73,5%). Los péptidos natriuréticos son los biomarcadores más utilizados (90%). Se titulan los cuatro grupos farmacológicos fundamentales de tratamiento de la IC a la vez mayoritariamente (85%). Solo 24% de las unidades mantienen una comunicación fluida con atención primaria. Conclusiones Los dos modelos de UIC liderados por cardiología y medicina interna son complementarios, disponen de enfermería especializada, y siguen al paciente de forma mixta, con una adherencia farmacológica muy alta a las últimas recomendaciones científicas. El principal punto de mejora es la coordinación con atención primaria (AU)

Background and objectives Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with high prevalence, incidence and mortality rates leading to high healthcare burden. In Spain, there are multidisciplinary HF units coordinated by cardiology and internal medicine. Our objective was to describe its current organizational model and their adherence to the latest scientific recommendations. Materials and methods In late 2021, a scientific committee (with cardiology and internal medicine specialists) developed a questionnaire that was sent as an online survey to 110 HF units [73 from cardiology (accredited by SEC-Excelente) and 37 from internal medicine (integrated in UMIPIC program)]. Results We received 83 answers (75.5% total: 49 from cardiology and 34 from internal medicine). The results showed that HF units are mostly integrated by specialists from cardiology, internal medicine and specialized nurse practitioners (34.9%). Patient characteristics from HF units are widely different when comparing those in cardiology to UMIPIC, being the latter older, more frequently with preserved ejection fraction and higher comorbidity burden. Most HF units (73.5%) currently use a hybrid face-to-face/virtual model to perform patient follow-up. Natriuretic peptides are the biomarkers most commonly used (90%). All four disease-modifying drug classes are mainly implemented at the same time (85%). Only 24% of HF units hold fluent communication with primary care. Conclusions Both models from cardiology and internal medicine HF units are complementary, they include specialized nursing, they use hybrid approach for patient follow-up and they display a high adherence to the latest guideline recommendations. Coordination with primary care remains as the major improvement area (AU)

Coordinating Cardiology clinics randomized trial of interventions to improve outcomes (COORDINATE) - Diabetes: rationale and design.

Several medications that are proven to reduce cardiovascular events exist for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, however they are substantially underused in clinical practice. Clinician, patient, and system-level barriers all contribute to these gaps in care; yet, there is a paucity of high quality, rigorous studies evaluating the role of interventions to increase utilization. The COORDINATE-Diabetes trial randomized 42 cardiology clinics across the United States to either a multifaceted, site-specific intervention focused on evidence-based care for patients with T2DM or standard of care. The multifaceted intervention comprised the development of an interdisciplinary care pathway for each clinic, audit-and-feedback tools and educational outreach, in addition to patient-facing tools. The primary outcome is the proportion of individuals with T2DM prescribed three key classes of evidence-based medications (high-intensity statin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and either a sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and will be assessed at least 6 months after participant enrollment. COORDINATE-Diabetes aims to identify strategies that improve the implementation and adoption of evidence-based therapies.

Patología asociada al consumo de metanfetamina cristalizada (shabú) en un centro hospitalario de tercer nivel / Emergencies associated with shabu — crystal methamphetamine — in a tertiary care hospital

No disponible

Registros de enfermagem em uma emergência cardiológica: características, diagnósticos e intervenções de enfermagem / Registros de enfermería en una emergencia cardiológica: características, diagnósticos e intervenciones de enfermería / Nursing records in a cardiology emergency: characteristics, diagnoses and nursing interventions

Objetivo: analisar os registros de enfermagem, no contexto do paciente cardiológico na emergência. Método: estudo quantitativo, descritivo, realizado de maio a junho de 2018, por meio da avaliação dos registros eletrônicos de enfermagem de uma emergência cardiológica, utilizando roteiro pré-elaborado. Análise por estatística simples descritiva. Resultados: dos 140 registros de enfermagem, identificou-se 53 itens: 46(86,79%) referentes às necessidades psicobiológicas, 6(11,32%) psicossociais e 1(1,89%) psicoespiritual. Encontraram-se 22 diagnósticos de enfermagem, com destaque no risco de infecção 90(64,28%), processo cardíaco prejudicado 78(55,71%) e risco de alterações cardiovasculares/hemodinâmica 34(24,28%). E 14 intervenções de enfermagem, incluindo: monitorar sinais vitais 20(14,28%); avaliar dor 16(11,42%); manter ambiente calmo e tranquilo 15(10,71%). Conclusão: os registros apresentam deficiência quanto às características dos pacientes cardíacos, intervenções de enfermagem superficiais e desconexas aos diagnósticos de enfermagem mais frequentes.(AU)

Objective: to analyze the nursing records in the context of cardiac patients in the emergency room. Method: quantitative, descriptive study, carried out from May to June 2018, through the evaluation of electronic nursing records of a cardiology emergency, using a pre-prepared script. Simple descriptive statistical analysis. Results: from 140 nursing records, 53 items were identified: 46(86.79%) referring to psychobiological needs, 6(11.32%) psychosocial and 1(1.89%) psychospiritual. 22 nursing diagnoses were found, with emphasis on the risk of infection 90(64.28%), impaired cardiac process 78(55.71%) and risk of cardiovascular/hemodynamic changes 34(24.28%). And 14 nursing interventions, including: monitoring vital signs 20(14.28%); assess pain 16(11.42%); maintain a calm and peaceful environment 15(10.71%). Conclusion: the records show deficiencies regarding the characteristics of cardiac patients, superficial nursing interventions and disconnected from the most frequent nursing diagnoses.(AU)

Objetivo: analizar los registros de enfermería en contexto de pacientes cardíacos en urgencias. Método: estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, realizado de mayo a junio de 2018, mediante la evaluación de registros electrónicos de enfermería de una emergencia cardiológica, utilizando un guión preestablecido. Análisis estadístico descriptivo simple. Resultados: 140 registros de enfermería se identificaron 53 ítems: 46(86,79%) necesidades psicobiológicas, 6(11,32%) psicosociales, 1(1,89%) psicoespiritual. Encontraron 22 diagnósticos de enfermería, con énfasis en riesgo de infección 90(64,28%), deterioro del proceso cardíaco 78(55,71%), riesgo de alteraciones cardiovasculares/hemodinámicas 34(24,28%). 14 intervenciones de enfermería, que incluyen: seguimiento de signos vitales 20(14,28%); evaluar dolor 16(11,42%); mantener ambiente tranquilo y pacífico 15(10,71%). Conclusión: los registros muestran deficiencias en cuanto a las características de los pacientes cardíacos, intervenciones de enfermería superficiales y desconectadas de los diagnósticos de enfermería más frecuentes.(AU)

Resultados de un programa multidisciplinar de soporte circulatorio mecánico en shock cardiogénico en un centro sin programa de trasplante cardiaco: un modelo exitoso de coordinación entre profesionales / Outcomes of a multidisciplinary mechanical circulatory support network in cardiogenic shock in a centre without heart transplant program: A successful interprofessional coordination model

Antecedentes y objetivo: El shock cardiogénico (SC) conlleva una elevada mortalidad, y algunos pacientes pueden beneficiarse del uso de soporte circulatorio mecánico (SCM). El objetivo de este estudio es analizar los resultados de un programa multidisciplinar (constituido por anestesiología y reanimación, cardiología, cirugía cardiaca y medicina intensiva) de atención a pacientes en SC que precisaron SCM en un hospital terciario sin programa de trasplante cardiaco. (TC). Materiales y métodosEstudio prospectivo observacional que analiza las características y predictores de supervivencia hospitalaria de los pacientes con SC que precisaron SCM. Resultados: Se incluyeron 48 pacientes. Edad media 61±14años. El 45,8% presentaron parada cardiaca previa al implante. La supervivencia a 30días fue del 54,2% y la supervivencia al alta hospitalaria, del 45,8%. La edad y la escala de vasoactivos inotrópicos fueron predictores independientes de mortalidad. Conclusiones: La instauración de un programa multidisciplinar de SCM en un centro sin programa de TC es factible y aplicable a pacientes con SC, con resultados favorables en cuanto a supervivencia hospitalaria.(AU)

Background and objective: Cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remains very high and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may provide an effective alternative of treatment in selected patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the results of a multidisciplinary team care program (including anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, and intensivists) in CS patients who required MCS, in a tertiary centre without a heart transplant (HT) program. Methods: Prospective observational study that sought to analyse the characteristics and survival to discharge predictors in a consecutive CS patients cohort treated with MCS. Results: A total of 48 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 14 years. Before MCS, 45.8% of the patients presented with cardiac arrest. A 54.2% 30-day survival and 45.8% overall survival to discharge, was found. Age and vasoactive-inotropic score were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team-care based MCS program in CS patients is feasible and may achieve favourable results in a centre without HT program.(AU)

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ambulatory heart failure nurse-led services: an integrated review.

BACKGROUND: Globally the burden of heart failure is rising. Hospitalisation is one of the main contributors to the burden of heart failure and unfortunately, the majority of heart failure patients will experience multiple hospitalisations over their lifetime. Considering the high health care cost associated with heart failure, a review of economic evaluations of post-discharge heart failure services is warranted. AIM: An integrated review of the economic evaluations of post-discharge nurse-led heart failure services for patients hospitalised with acute heart failure. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched using EBSCOHost: CINAHL complete, Medline complete, Embase, Scopus, EconLit, Global Health, and Health source (Consumer and Nursing/Academic) for published articles until 22nd June 2021. The searches focussed on papers that examined the cost-effectiveness of nurse-led clinics or telemonitoring involving nurses to follow-up patients after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. GRADE criteria and CHEERS checklist were used to determine the quality of the evidence and the quality of reporting of the economic evaluation. RESULTS: Out of 453 studies identified, eight studies were included: four in heart failure clinics and four in telemonitoring programs. Five of the articles were cost-effectiveness analyses, one a cost comparison and two studies involved economic modelling The GRADE criteria were rated as high in five studies. In which, four studies examined the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring programs. Based on the CHEERS checklist for reporting quality of economic evaluations, the majority of economic evaluations were rated between 86 and 96%. All the studies found the intervention to be cost-effective compared to usual care with Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratios ranging from $18 259 (Canadian dollars)/life year gained to €40,321 per Quality Adjusted Life Years gained. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led heart failure clinics and telemonitoring programs were found to be cost-effective. Certainly, this review has shown that heart failure clinics and telemonitoring programs do represent value for money with their greatest impact and cost savings through reducing rehospitalisations.

Longer-Term Results of a Universal Electronic Consultation Program at the Cardiology Department of a Galician Healthcare Area.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine models play a key role in organizing the growing demand for care and healthcare accessibility, but there are no described longer-term results in health care. Our objective is to assess the longer-term results (delay time in care, accessibility, and hospital admissions) of an electronic consultation (e-consultation) outpatient care program. METHODS: Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from the 41 258 patients referred by primary care to the cardiology department from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Until 2012, all patients were attended in an in-person consultation (2010-2012). In 2013, we instituted an e-consultation program (2013-2019) for all primary care referrals to cardiologists that preceded patients' in-person consultations when considered. We used an interrupted time series regression approach to investigate the impact of the e-consultation on (1) delay time (days) in care and (2) hospital admissions. We also analyzed (3) total number and referral rate (population-adjusted referred rate) in both periods (in-person consultation and e-consultation), and (4) the accessibility was measured as number of consultations and variation according to distance from municipality and reference hospital. RESULTS: During the e-consultation, the demand increased (7.2±2.4% versus 10.1±4.8% per 1000 inhabitants, P<0.001), and referrals from different areas were equalized. The reduction in delay to consultation during the in-person consultation (-0.96 [95% CI, -0.951 to -0.966], P<0.001) was maintained with e-consultations (-0.064 [95% CI, 0.043-0.085], P<0.001). After the implementation of e-consultation, we observed that the increasing of hospital admission observed in the in-person consultation (incidence rate ratio, 1.011 [95% CI, 1.003-1.018]), was stabilized (incidence rate ratio, 1.000 [95% CI, 0.985-1.015]; P=0.874). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing e-consultations in the outpatient management model may improve accessibility of care for patients furthest from the referral hospital. After e-consultations were implemented, the upward trend of hospital admissions observed during the in-person consultation period was stabilized with a slight downward trend.

Couverture vaccinale et raisons de l'acceptation et de l'hésitation à la vaccination contre la COVID-19 chez les patients porteurs de pathologie cardiovasculaire à Ouahigouya / Vaccination coverage and reasons for accept ance orhesitation in vaccination against COVI D-19 in patients with cardiovascular disease in Ouahigouya

Objectif. La pandémie de COVID-19 a été cause d'une mortalité élevée chez les patients porteurs de comorbidités comme les pathologies cardiovasculaires. L'accélération de la mise sur marché des vaccins contre la pandémie a suscité une réticence envers ces derniers. L'étudié porte sur l'attitude des patients porteurs de pathologie cardiovasculaires vus en consultation cardiologique à Ouahigouya vis-à-vis de la vaccination contre la COVID-19. Population et méthodes. Une étude transversale a été menée du 1er au 25 avril 2022 dans trois cliniques privées de la ville de Ouahigouya. Nous avons inclus les patients consentants et porteurs de pathologie cardiovasculaire vus en consultation cardiologique. Le questionnaire était centré sur les connaissances, attitudes et pratiques de groupe vis-à-vis de la vaccination, notamment les raisons de 'l'acceptation ou du refus de se faire vacciner. Résultats. Cent-un patients ont été interviewés. Le sex-ratio était 1,46 avec un âge moyen de 48,26 ± 11,93 ans. Les plus représentés étaient les travailleurs indépendants, les urbains, les musulmans, les non-scolarisés et les mariés. L'HTA et ses complications étaient les atteintes cardiovasculaires les plus fréquentes (93,07%). La proportion de vaccinés était de 55,45%. Les raisons les plus évoquées par les vaccinés pour se vacciner étaient pour se protéger (100%) et le suivi des Recommandations gouvernementales et des agents respectivement 78,52% et 72,21%. Les raisons de l'hésitation vaccinale les plus citées étaient : la COVID-19 est une maladie banale (62,22%) et la peur des effets secondaires (44,44%). Conclusion. La vaccination contre la COVID-19 devrait se poursuivre, accompagnée d'une sensibilisation efficace afin d'améliorer le taux de couverture vaccinale parmi les patients porteurs de pathologies cardiovasculaires

Objective. COVID-19 pandemic has caused high mortality in patients with comorbidities such as cardiovascular pathologies. The acceleration of the marketing of vaccines against the pandemic has caused reluctance towards them. The study focuses on the attitude of patients with cardiovascular disease seen in cardiology consultation in Ouahigouya vis-à-vis COVID-19 vaccination. Population and methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 1 to 25, 2022 in three private clinics of the city of Ouahigouya. We included consenting patients and carriers of cardiovascular pathology seen in cardiology consultation. Our main data of interest were the knowledge, attitude and practice of this population towards vaccination, especially thereasons for accepting or refusing vaccination. Results One hundred and one patients were interviewed. The sex ratio was 1.46 with an average age of 48.26 ± 11.93 years. The most represented were the self-employed, urban dwellers, Muslims, the uneducated and the married. Hypertension and its complications were the most common cardiovascular disorders (93.07%). The proportion of vaccinated was 55.45%. The reasons most mentioned by the vaccinated for getting vaccinated were to protect themselves (100%) and to follow government recommendations and agents, respectively 78.52% and 72.21%. The most cited reasons for vaccine hesitation were: COVID-19 is a common disease (62.22%) and fear of side effects (44.44%). Conclusion. Vaccination against COVID-19 must continue, accompanied by effective awareness-raising in order to improve the vaccination coverage rate among patients with cardiovascular pathologies

Long-term hospital-based secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite established guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, practical implementation of treatment targets is deficient even in high-income countries. This study compared long-term hospital-based treatment with follow-up at primary health care regarding new cardiovascular events and achievement of treatment targets. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial at Sørlandet Hospital, Norway 2007-2021 included patients hospitalized due to myocardial infarction (n = 760) or after scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 677) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 103). Patients were randomized to hospital-based secondary preventive care with consultations 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the index event and annually for up to 5 years, or follow-up at primary health care. Final data was collected after 10 years and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Composite endpoint-free survival due to a lower rate of PCI improved in patients with hospital-based follow-up (n = 788) compared to patients followed-up at primary health care (n = 752) (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96; p = 0.02) but all-cause mortality was not reduced (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59-1.56; p = 0.86). At 1 year, LDL-cholesterol (2.1 [SD 0.7] versus 2.3 [SD 0.8] mmol/l; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (132 [SD 16] versus 142 [SD 20] mm/Hg; p < 0.001) were lower in the hospital-based group, and the differences remained significant during the first 5 years. Other secondary preventive measures (smoking cessation, physical activity, body weight, glucose control, drug adherence) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term hospital-based secondary preventive follow-up improved composite endpoint-free survival, but not mortality. Substantial risk factors remained unaddressed. The beneficial effects on blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol disappeared after annual consultations ceased. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00679237) May 16, 2008.

Sex-differences in the management and clinical outcome among patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The current study was to compare the management and clinical outcome between women and men with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHOD: This was a retrospective study. Patients with ACS presented to the emergency department were enrolled. Management and clinical outcomes (including mortality and acute decompensated heart failure [ADHF]) were compared between women and men. RESULTS: A total of 686 patients were included and women accounted for 38.5% (n = 264). Women were less likely to receive ticagrelor at the emergency department (18.2% vs 25.1%). Duration from arrival at the emergency department to undergo electrocardiogram was longer in women (7.5 min vs 5.3 min). The duration from symptom onset to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention was longer in women (14.4 h vs 7.2 h). After adjusting for covariates, odds ratio (OR) for cardiovascular mortality was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-1.02) and ADHF was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55-1.01) for women vs men. Socioeconomic status, duration from symptom onset to arrive at the emergency department, and management at the emergency department were the important factors contributing to the sex-differences in clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Among ACS patients undergoing PCI, there was no sex-difference in in-hospital clinical outcome after adjusting for covariates. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether improving management at the emergency department can improve clinical outcomes in women and men with ACS.

30 day predicted outcome in undifferentiated chest pain: multicenter validation of the HEART score in Tunisian population.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain remains one of the most challenging serious complaints in the emergency department (ED). A prompt and accurate risk stratification tool for chest pain patients is paramount to help physcian effectively progrnosticate outcomes. HEART score is considered one of the best scores for chest pain risk stratification. However, most validation studies of HEART score were not performed in populations different from those included in the original one. OBJECTIVE: To validate HEART score as a prognostication tool, among Tunisian ED patients with undifferentiated chest pain. METHODS: Our prospective, multicenter study enrolled adult patients presenting with chest pain at chest pain units. Patients over 30 years of age with a primary complaint of chest pain were enrolled. HEART score was calculated for every patient. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events (MACE) occurrence, including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary revascularisation over 30 days following the ED visit. The discriminative power of HEART score was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve. A calibration analysis of the HEART score in this population was performed using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of test. RESULTS: We enrolled 3880 patients (age 56.3; 59.5% males). The application of HEART score showed that most patients were in intermediate risk category (55.3%). Within 30 days of ED visit, MACE were reported in 628 (16.2%) patients, with an incidence of 1.2% in the low risk group, 10.8% in the intermediate risk group and 62.4% in the high risk group. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.88). HEART score was not well calibrated (χ2 statistic = 12.34; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: HEART score showed a good discrimination performance in predicting MACE occurrence at 30 days for Tunisian patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain. Heart score was not well calibrated in our population.